|
Suggestions should clarify
review process
Judge Advocate offers tips on
updating Post by-laws
By Art Lustig
Judge Advocate, Department of Ohio
Each year quite a few, like 20 to 30, Post
Constitutions and By-Laws are submitted to the
Department for review and approval by the Judge
Advocate, which at least for the time being, is
me.
Although the duties of this position include
counseling the Department officers and Executive
Committee on all legal matters (not to mention
working at my regular employment), the majority of
volunteer hours are spent advising, revising,
rending and amending those all important documents
which form the basis for our American Legion
Posts.
Believe it or not, it can take up to a couple of
hours to review them, contact the Post, discuss the
whys and wherefores, review the amended version and
then finally give the okay.
Over the past several months certain errors,
mistakes, misconceptions and the like have been all
too commonplace among those items forwarded for
review. With your help, my job and the level of
your frustration will be greatly diminished. What
follows is a list of the most common things that
you may avoid in future. Some are perhaps petty.
Others are of major import (you decide):
1) NUMBER THE PAGES: Have you ever
inadvertently dropped a 20-page document and tried
to reassemble it in the proper order? I have and it
ain't fun. Number the pages.
2) OFFICER'S GUIDE: Printed in the 2009
edition on page 123 is a sample post Constitution
& By-Laws. It is only a sample, a guide for
Posts in all the Departments. It is not, 'one size
fits all.' Too many Ohio Posts merely copy from the
Officer's Guide not thinking that portions may not
be applicable in The Department of Ohio.
The most troublesome submissions contain this
from the By-Laws, Art. II, Sec. 3 (page 125) "A
vacancy shall exist when a member or officer is
absent from the Post for a continuous period
considered detrimental to the interest of the Post
by the Executive Committee."
Unfortunately, this is an entirely subjective
standard. Actually it is no standard at all. What
may be deemed detrimental to one member may not to
another. Each Post may be the judge of its own
members; however in our American Legion we believe
all are entitled to a fair, unbiased and objective
hearing. The accepted guide is found in Art. IV,
Sec. 2 of the Department By-Laws. "Members may be
reprimanded, suspended or expelled from the
American Legion, and officers may be reprimanded,
removed from office, suspended or expelled from
membership only upon proper showing of cause." The
procedure is then fully detailed.
3) RESIGNATION: Back in the 1980s J/A
Kessler together with Adjutant Pat Hone recognized
the problem of quickly addressing a situation where
a committeeman, has not been doing his job, cobbled
together the following which has been applied to
other committee members as well as trustees, and
has stood the test of time: "The resignation of an
Executive Committee member shall happen in one of
three ways: (1) written notice presented to the
commander, (2) verbal resignation to the members in
regular meeting and, (3) the absence for three
consecutive meetings without prior notification and
approval by the members at a regular meeting."
4) THE FINAL SAY: Perhaps of greatest
importance is this. The Post Commander is not the
Post Fuhrer, nor is the Executive Committee the
Post oligarchy. We are a grass-roots organization.
The general membership always, no exceptions, can
accept or reject any thing proposed or done by any
officer, Trustee, Executive Committee member, etc.
They, and they alone, have the final say.
So there you have it, or rather, them. Call them
my pet peeves or whatever you like, but paying some
attention should certainly aid in completing those
revisions so badly needed by so many American
Legion Posts, some of which haven't done a revision
for over 40 years!
Is yours one of them?
|